抖阴社区

                                    

The average strong hunter here has between 100-300 million total MCP.

So, the amount of mana being used during training wouldn't be more than 100-300k MP in a single session.

From my own experience, it feels as if the data is not very solid to compare. I have regeneration skills, a teammate with an instant fatigue curing ability that lets me train endlessly, and too many unique scenarios to count.

My mind races trying to come up with an answer here.

I'm unsure if a day is too long or too short. The same goes for a week or even a month.

I decide to skip it and come back.

[What is the maximum Level Monster a team of 5 level 500 Association Hunter's should attempt to subjugate?]

I scratch my head and think about this one too for a moment, but skip it and move on to the next one.

[What is the hierarchy of command in the Association Between the ranks of Elite to Regional Director?]

I skip again as I have no knowledge of this topic either.

[Skip]

[Skip]

[Skip]

Over and over, I skip through niche questions that want descriptive and direct answers about topics I'd really only know if I were trained classically by members of the higher-ups in the Association.

There are a few about why and how dungeon breaks form that I manage to get lucky on, along with identifying what kind of item drops fall from certain kinds of monsters. However, these questions hardly make up more than 20% of the total.

I continue to skip through the questions I have no idea about and make it to the 100th question where at the bottom of the page it reads [Finish].

Over half of the time is leftover on the counter while I spam the back button and start filling in answers to the questions I left blank.

The knowledge I have about the inner workings of the Association is very minimal. That's about 30% of the test questions. I'm able to logically deduce certain answers, but others are just niche knowledge that can't be learned.

A solid portion of the test, over 10%, actually deals with the average cost of magical goods; I ace this section without a problem.

However, the remaining 40% is filled with questions asking about random scenarios like the average level that hunters should fight up to when in teams, or an explanation of why fire types should never challenge water or ice types of similar strength.

I can fudge answers that seem to be correct, but it all seems far too rigid, like they want me to recite an answer that a teacher has given me.

From my actual battle experience in countless fights against the odds, I've found that many of these scenarios can be flipped right on their head.

While it may be the safest way to train recruits on a massive scale, this kind of brainwashing to play it safe and not push the limits of each hunter's individual understanding of their abilities irks me quite a bit.

It's like they're making mindless rule following soldiers that all think the same.

These ideas bleed through into my answers quite a bit on some of the scenarios that are asked about.

They give the freedom to write abstract answers, so that's exactly what I give, explaining how it is very dependent on what skills each teammate has and their base stats as well.

Just because a monster may be higher level than the hunter, or even have a massive mana control advantage; sometimes the hunter has a better understanding of the landscape and can use the dungeon mass to their advantage. Other times they may have a speed or agility edge and can wear the monster out.

[CH399+ Continued] Dungeon Diver: Stealing A Monster's PowerWhere stories live. Discover now